Spells, Herbs and Surgery: Medical Care in a Provincial Balkan Town in the 19th Century (2)
January 10, 2008
By Dejan Ciric
In the second of a three-part series, Serbian historian Dejan Ciric details those fun diseases — up to and including the plague — that periodically devastated the Balkans in the 19th century.
Owing to its specific geographic location in the center of the Balkans, midway on the road between the two significant cities of
Information about the first plague epidemic in Pirot during the 19th century is found in the Russian book Apostle, kept at the church in the
The second plague infection in Pirot started in 1838. It emerged first in 1834 in
Such events naturally caused the government of the Serbian Principality to take strong protective measures. Prince Milos decided to make stronger efforts at several border passes in December 1836, enforcing a quarantine that lasted ten days. At the same time, some Bulgarian merchants from
However, the Turkish governor in
During the summer, the disease spread to fifteen villages in the Pirot region. In the town itself, more than fifty people were dying every day. Very soon, the infection appeared in the small town of
Apart from the great state of fear and confusion, people were trying to protect themselves by keeping families in their homes, burning the clothes of the dead and their bodies, abandoning old houses and even moving entire villages. Many communities were looking for safety in the churches and from priests.[xi] The appearance of tuberculosis in Pirot was not an exception; it could be said that people were living with the disease every day, and suffered from it over their entire lives and through several family generations.
Not long after the liberation of Pirot in December 1877, the government started to realize a very difficult task to introduce some urgent measures in the field of medical care. At that time appeared the first county and municipal doctors, who noted the most important facts about diseases and mortal cases. According to an account of 1883, 25 percent of mortal cases occurred because of tuberculosis- double that of typhus victims, or five time that of fatalities due to diphtheria. This is one of the proofs of the very low level of hygiene in the local population of the time.[xii] According to an account of 1903, however, the situation was much better, because there were only 13 people ill of tuberculosis, and only one dead, though we can be sure there were more cases than noted.[xiii]
Stories about many sufferers could be important and useful for understanding the health circumstances in Pirot at the time. A teacher of Serbian language and literature in the
Terrible hygienic conditions and very bad food lead to weak and sensitive bodies, vulnerable to various diseases. According to Dr. Sienkievicz`s medical account, it is possible to ascertain a general picture of the health situation in Pirot. During 1883, 25 percent of fatalities were caused by the infectious diseases of typhus, scarlet fever, diphtheria and dysentery. Various kinds of fevers were involved in 32 percent of all mortal cases. It is interesting that Dr. Sienkievicz noticed marasmus as a cause of death in 4.5 percent of cases. Most fascinating to note is that more than 50 percent of all mortal cases involved children of less than one year of age.[xvii]
In order to better comprehend these facts, we should compare them with those in developed countries. Fore example, in the USA, the mortality rate in children up to five years of age was 20 percent at the end of the 19th and beginning of the 20th centuries. The main cause of death there were infectious diseases (mainly diphtheria and smallpox), just as in Pirot.[xviii]
As a more effective measure against smallpox, healing doctors recommended vaccination; a priest, Dimitrije Cvetkovic, ordered in January 1881 that all clergymen must teach the local population about the significance and positive effects of vaccination. This order was enforced at all churches in the region.[xix] Smallpox healing was well known in the Pirot area decades before, but it had not been carried out systematically. The evidence of this can be found in the Pirot Lekarusa.[xx] Over the years, this measure showed positive results and became an obligation, so that by 1903 some 3,119 children in the county were vaccinated.[xxi] Similar measures were undertaken by many European states during the 19th century, so that by the beginning of the next it became almost a kind of national prestige.[xxii]
However, even this general improvement in living standards and conditions and better medical treatment could not help during the Balkan Wars in 1912-13. The difficult war situation caused a typhus epidemic in 1913, despite the fact that the local authorities introduced measures and the bishop of
[i] ˆšÃª?. ˆšÃªÂ¬ÃºˆšÃªÂ¬ˆžˆšÃªÂ¬Î©ˆšÃªÂ¬Ã¦ˆšÃªÂ¬ÂªˆšÃªÂ¬Ã¦ˆšÃªÂ¬‰¤ˆšÃªÂ¬ˆž-ˆšÃª?ˆšÃªÂ¬ˆˆšÃªÂ¬ˆ«ˆšÃªÂ¬Ã¦ˆšÃªÂ¬ÂªˆšÃªÂ¬Ã¦ˆšÃªÂ¬‰¤ˆšÃªÂ¬ˆž, ˆšÃªÂ¬ÃŸˆšÃ«Â¬Ã‰ˆšÃªÂ¬ÂºˆšÃªÂ¬ˆžˆšÃªÂ¬‰¤ˆšÃªÂ¬ˆˆšÃ«Â¬Ã‡ˆšÃªÂ¬Âµ ˆšÃªÂ¬‰¤ˆšÃ«Â¬Ã„ˆšÃªÂ¬ÂµˆšÃªÂ¬ÂºˆšÃªÂ¬ÂµˆšÃªÂ¬Î©ˆšÃªÂ¬ˆž (1700-1850), ˆšÃªÂ¬Â°ˆšÃªÂ¬Ã¦ˆšÃ«Â¬Ã‘ˆšÃªÂ¬ˆˆšÃªÂ¬ˆž, 2004, p 80.
[ii] Ibid, p. 75.
[iii] Ibid, pp. 33-34.
[iv] ˆšÃªÂ¬üˆšÃªÂ¬ˆˆšÃ«Â¬Ã„ˆšÃªÂ¬Ã¦ˆšÃ«Â¬Ã‡ ˆšÃªÂ¬ˆ ˆšÃ«?ˆšÃ«Â¬Ã„ˆšÃªÂ¬ÂµˆšÃªÂ¬ˆ‘ ˆšÃª?ˆšÃªÂ¬ˆˆšÃ«Â¬Ã ˆšÃªÂ¬ˆžˆšÃªÂ¬‰¤ˆšÃ«?ˆšÃªÂ¬ˆ«ˆšÃªÂ¬ˆ 1801-1883. ˆšÃªÂ¬Ã¬ˆšÃ«Â¬Ã„ˆšÃªÂ¬ˆžˆšÃ«Â¬ÃˆšÃªÂ¬ˆž I, ˆšÃªÂ¬üˆšÃ«Â¬Ã„ˆšÃªÂ¬ˆˆšÃ«Â¬Ã„ˆšÃªÂ¬ÂµˆšÃªÂ¬Â¥ˆšÃªÂ¬ˆˆšÃªÂ¬Ã¦ ˆšÃªÂ¬Ã². ˆšÃª?ˆšÃªÂ¬ˆˆšÃªÂ¬ˆ«ˆšÃªÂ¬Ã¦ˆšÃªÂ¬ÂªˆšÃªÂ¬ˆˆšÃ«Â¬Ãµ, ˆšÃªÂ¬üˆšÃªÂ¬ˆˆšÃ«Â¬Ã„ˆšÃªÂ¬Ã¦ˆšÃ«Â¬Ã‡, 1981, pp. 71-74.
[v] ˆšÃªÂ¬Ã²ˆšÃ«?ˆšÃ«Â¬Ã‡ˆšÃªÂ¬Ã¦, 77-79.
[vi] ˆšÃª?. ˆšÃªÂ¬ÃºˆšÃªÂ¬ˆžˆšÃªÂ¬Î©ˆšÃªÂ¬Ã¦ˆšÃªÂ¬ÂªˆšÃªÂ¬Ã¦ˆšÃªÂ¬‰¤ˆšÃªÂ¬ˆž-ˆšÃª?ˆšÃªÂ¬ˆˆšÃªÂ¬ˆ«ˆšÃªÂ¬Ã¦ˆšÃªÂ¬ÂªˆšÃªÂ¬Ã¦ˆšÃªÂ¬‰¤ˆšÃªÂ¬ˆž, p. 99; ˆšÃªÂ¬Ã. ˆšÃªÂ¬Â°ˆšÃ«Â¬Ã‡ˆšÃªÂ¬Ã¦ˆšÃ«Â¬Ã²ˆšÃªÂ¬ˆžˆšÃªÂ¬Î©ˆšÃ«Â¬Ã¡ˆšÃªÂ¬ÂµˆšÃªÂ¬‰¤ˆšÃªÂ¬ˆˆšÃ«Â¬Ãµ, ˆšÃªÂ¬Ã ˆšÃ«Â¬Ã‰ˆšÃªÂ¬‰¥ˆšÃªÂ¬Ã¦ˆšÃªÂ¬ˆˆšÃ«?ˆšÃ«Â¬Ã‡ˆšÃªÂ¬Ã¦ˆšÃ«Â¬Ã¡ˆšÃªÂ¬Î©ˆšÃªÂ¬ˆž ˆšÃªÂ¬Â°ˆšÃ«Â¬Ã„ˆšÃªÂ¬Â±ˆšÃªÂ¬ˆˆšÃ«Â¬Ã²ˆšÃªÂ¬ˆž ˆšÃ«Â¬Ã‰ XIX ˆšÃªÂ¬‰¤ˆšÃªÂ¬ÂµˆšÃªÂ¬ˆ«ˆšÃ«Â¬Ã‰ (1804-1878), ˆšÃª?ˆšÃªÂ¬ˆˆšÃ«Â¬Ã , 1996, p. 120.
[vii] ˆšÃª?. ˆšÃªÂ¬ÃºˆšÃªÂ¬ˆžˆšÃªÂ¬Î©ˆšÃªÂ¬Ã¦ˆšÃªÂ¬ÂªˆšÃªÂ¬Ã¦ˆšÃªÂ¬‰¤ˆšÃªÂ¬ˆž-ˆšÃª?ˆšÃªÂ¬ˆˆšÃªÂ¬ˆ«ˆšÃªÂ¬Ã¦ˆšÃªÂ¬ÂªˆšÃªÂ¬Ã¦ˆšÃªÂ¬‰¤ˆšÃªÂ¬ˆž, pp. 80-81, 88.
[viii] Ibid, p. 90.
[ix] Ibid, p. 9.
[x] Ibid, pp. 180-81.
[xi] Ibid, pp. 187-190.
[xii] ˆšÃªÂ¬üˆšÃªÂ¬ˆˆšÃ«Â¬Ã„ˆšÃªÂ¬Ã¦ˆšÃ«Â¬Ã‡ ˆšÃªÂ¬ˆ ˆšÃ«?ˆšÃ«Â¬Ã„ˆšÃªÂ¬ÂµˆšÃªÂ¬ˆ‘ ˆšÃª?ˆšÃªÂ¬ˆˆšÃ«Â¬Ã ˆšÃªÂ¬ˆžˆšÃªÂ¬‰¤ˆšÃ«?ˆšÃªÂ¬ˆ«ˆšÃªÂ¬ˆ 1883-1893. ˆšÃªÂ¬Ã¬ˆšÃ«Â¬Ã„ˆšÃªÂ¬ˆžˆšÃ«Â¬ÃˆšÃªÂ¬ˆž II, ˆšÃªÂ¬üˆšÃ«Â¬Ã„ˆšÃªÂ¬ˆˆšÃ«Â¬Ã„ˆšÃªÂ¬ÂµˆšÃªÂ¬Â¥ˆšÃªÂ¬ˆˆšÃªÂ¬Ã¦ ˆšÃªÂ¬Ã². ˆšÃª?ˆšÃªÂ¬ˆˆšÃªÂ¬ˆ«ˆšÃªÂ¬Ã¦ˆšÃªÂ¬ÂªˆšÃªÂ¬ˆˆšÃ«Â¬Ãµ, ˆšÃªÂ¬üˆšÃªÂ¬ˆˆšÃ«Â¬Ã„ˆšÃªÂ¬Ã¦ˆšÃ«Â¬Ã‡, 1982, pp. 8-9.
[xiii] ˆšÃªÂ¬üˆšÃªÂ¬ˆˆšÃ«Â¬Ã„ˆšÃªÂ¬Ã¦ˆšÃ«Â¬Ã‡ ˆšÃªÂ¬ˆ ˆšÃ«?ˆšÃ«Â¬Ã„ˆšÃªÂ¬ÂµˆšÃªÂ¬ˆ‘ ˆšÃª?ˆšÃªÂ¬ˆˆšÃ«Â¬Ã ˆšÃªÂ¬ˆžˆšÃªÂ¬‰¤ˆšÃ«?ˆšÃªÂ¬ˆ«ˆšÃªÂ¬ˆ 1894-1918. ˆšÃªÂ¬Ã¬ˆšÃ«Â¬Ã„ˆšÃªÂ¬ˆžˆšÃ«Â¬ÃˆšÃªÂ¬ˆž III, ˆšÃªÂ¬üˆšÃ«Â¬Ã„ˆšÃªÂ¬ˆˆšÃ«Â¬Ã„ˆšÃªÂ¬ÂµˆšÃªÂ¬Â¥ˆšÃªÂ¬ˆˆšÃªÂ¬Ã¦ ˆšÃªÂ¬Ã². ˆšÃª?ˆšÃªÂ¬ˆˆšÃªÂ¬ˆ«ˆšÃªÂ¬Ã¦ˆšÃªÂ¬ÂªˆšÃªÂ¬ˆˆšÃ«Â¬Ãµ, ˆšÃªÂ¬üˆšÃªÂ¬ˆˆšÃ«Â¬Ã„ˆšÃªÂ¬Ã¦ˆšÃ«Â¬Ã‡, 1982, p. 552
[xiv] Ibid, pp. 326-27, 362.
[xv] ˆšÃªÂ¬üˆšÃªÂ¬ˆˆšÃ«Â¬Ã„ˆšÃªÂ¬Ã¦ˆšÃ«Â¬Ã‡ ˆšÃªÂ¬ˆ ˆšÃ«?ˆšÃ«Â¬Ã„ˆšÃªÂ¬ÂµˆšÃªÂ¬ˆ‘ ˆšÃª?ˆšÃªÂ¬ˆˆšÃ«Â¬Ã ˆšÃªÂ¬ˆžˆšÃªÂ¬‰¤ˆšÃ«?ˆšÃªÂ¬ˆ«ˆšÃªÂ¬ˆ 1801-1883. ˆšÃªÂ¬Ã¬ˆšÃ«Â¬Ã„ˆšÃªÂ¬ˆžˆšÃ«Â¬ÃˆšÃªÂ¬ˆž I, ˆšÃªÂ¬üˆšÃ«Â¬Ã„ˆšÃªÂ¬ˆˆšÃ«Â¬Ã„ˆšÃªÂ¬ÂµˆšÃªÂ¬Â¥ˆšÃªÂ¬ˆˆšÃªÂ¬Ã¦ ˆšÃªÂ¬Ã². ˆšÃª?ˆšÃªÂ¬ˆˆšÃªÂ¬ˆ«ˆšÃªÂ¬Ã¦ˆšÃªÂ¬ÂªˆšÃªÂ¬ˆˆšÃ«Â¬Ãµ, ˆšÃªÂ¬üˆšÃªÂ¬ˆˆšÃ«Â¬Ã„ˆšÃªÂ¬Ã¦ˆšÃ«Â¬Ã‡, 1981, p. 572.
[xvi] ˆšÃªÂ¬üˆšÃªÂ¬ˆˆšÃ«Â¬Ã„ˆšÃªÂ¬Ã¦ˆšÃ«Â¬Ã‡ ˆšÃªÂ¬ˆ ˆšÃ«?ˆšÃ«Â¬Ã„ˆšÃªÂ¬ÂµˆšÃªÂ¬ˆ‘ ˆšÃª?ˆšÃªÂ¬ˆˆšÃ«Â¬Ã ˆšÃªÂ¬ˆžˆšÃªÂ¬‰¤ˆšÃ«?ˆšÃªÂ¬ˆ«ˆšÃªÂ¬ˆ 1883-1893. ˆšÃªÂ¬Ã¬ˆšÃ«Â¬Ã„ˆšÃªÂ¬ˆžˆšÃ«Â¬ÃˆšÃªÂ¬ˆž II, ˆšÃªÂ¬üˆšÃ«Â¬Ã„ˆšÃªÂ¬ˆˆšÃ«Â¬Ã„ˆšÃªÂ¬ÂµˆšÃªÂ¬Â¥ˆšÃªÂ¬ˆˆšÃªÂ¬Ã¦ ˆšÃªÂ¬Ã². ˆšÃª?ˆšÃªÂ¬ˆˆšÃªÂ¬ˆ«ˆšÃªÂ¬Ã¦ˆšÃªÂ¬ÂªˆšÃªÂ¬ˆˆšÃ«Â¬Ãµ, ˆšÃªÂ¬üˆšÃªÂ¬ˆˆšÃ«Â¬Ã„ˆšÃªÂ¬Ã¦ˆšÃ«Â¬Ã‡, 1982, p. 4.
[xvii] Ibid, pp. 8-10.
[xviii] A. Minna Stern and H. Markel, The History of Vaccines and Immunization: Familiar Patterns, New Challenges, Health Affairs, 24 (2005) p. 611.
[xix] ˆšÃªÂ¬üˆšÃªÂ¬ˆˆšÃ«Â¬Ã„ˆšÃªÂ¬Ã¦ˆšÃ«Â¬Ã‡ ˆšÃªÂ¬ˆ ˆšÃ«?ˆšÃ«Â¬Ã„ˆšÃªÂ¬ÂµˆšÃªÂ¬ˆ‘ ˆšÃª?ˆšÃªÂ¬ˆˆšÃ«Â¬Ã ˆšÃªÂ¬ˆžˆšÃªÂ¬‰¤ˆšÃ«?ˆšÃªÂ¬ˆ«ˆšÃªÂ¬ˆ 1801-1883. ˆšÃªÂ¬Ã¬ˆšÃ«Â¬Ã„ˆšÃªÂ¬ˆžˆšÃ«Â¬ÃˆšÃªÂ¬ˆž I, ˆšÃªÂ¬üˆšÃ«Â¬Ã„ˆšÃªÂ¬ˆˆšÃ«Â¬Ã„ˆšÃªÂ¬ÂµˆšÃªÂ¬Â¥ˆšÃªÂ¬ˆˆšÃªÂ¬Ã¦ ˆšÃªÂ¬Ã². ˆšÃª?ˆšÃªÂ¬ˆˆšÃªÂ¬ˆ«ˆšÃªÂ¬Ã¦ˆšÃªÂ¬ÂªˆšÃªÂ¬ˆˆšÃ«Â¬Ãµ, ˆšÃªÂ¬üˆšÃªÂ¬ˆˆšÃ«Â¬Ã„ˆšÃªÂ¬Ã¦ˆšÃ«Â¬Ã‡, 1981, p. 537.
[xx] Pirot Lekarusa, sheet 13b.
[xxi] ˆšÃªÂ¬üˆšÃªÂ¬ˆˆšÃ«Â¬Ã„ˆšÃªÂ¬Ã¦ˆšÃ«Â¬Ã‡ ˆšÃªÂ¬ˆ ˆšÃ«?ˆšÃ«Â¬Ã„ˆšÃªÂ¬ÂµˆšÃªÂ¬ˆ‘ ˆšÃª?ˆšÃªÂ¬ˆˆšÃ«Â¬Ã ˆšÃªÂ¬ˆžˆšÃªÂ¬‰¤ˆšÃ«?ˆšÃªÂ¬ˆ«ˆšÃªÂ¬ˆ 1894-1918. ˆšÃªÂ¬Ã¬ˆšÃ«Â¬Ã„ˆšÃªÂ¬ˆžˆšÃ«Â¬ÃˆšÃªÂ¬ˆž III, ˆšÃªÂ¬üˆšÃ«Â¬Ã„ˆšÃªÂ¬ˆˆšÃ«Â¬Ã„ˆšÃªÂ¬ÂµˆšÃªÂ¬Â¥ˆšÃªÂ¬ˆˆšÃªÂ¬Ã¦ ˆšÃªÂ¬Ã². ˆšÃª?ˆšÃªÂ¬ˆˆšÃªÂ¬ˆ«ˆšÃªÂ¬Ã¦ˆšÃªÂ¬ÂªˆšÃªÂ¬ˆˆšÃ«Â¬Ãµ, ˆšÃªÂ¬üˆšÃªÂ¬ˆˆšÃ«Â¬Ã„ˆšÃªÂ¬Ã¦ˆšÃ«Â¬Ã‡ 1982, p. 553.
[xxii] A. M. Stern and H. Markel, p. 614; P. Domingo, The Triumph over the most Terrible of the Ministers of Death, Anales of Internal Medicine, 127 (1997) pp. 635-642; P.Skold, The Key to Success: The Role of Local Government in the Organization of Smallpox Vaccination in Sweden, Medical History 45 (2000), pp. 201-226.
[xxiii] Ibid, pp. 1036-37, 1039-40, 1042.
[xxiv] ˆšÃªÂ¬üˆšÃªÂ¬ˆˆšÃ«Â¬Ã„ˆšÃªÂ¬Ã¦ˆšÃ«Â¬Ã‡ ˆšÃªÂ¬ˆ ˆšÃ«?ˆšÃ«Â¬Ã„ˆšÃªÂ¬ÂµˆšÃªÂ¬ˆ‘ ˆšÃª?ˆšÃªÂ¬ˆˆšÃ«Â¬Ã ˆšÃªÂ¬ˆžˆšÃªÂ¬‰¤ˆšÃ«?ˆšÃªÂ¬ˆ«ˆšÃªÂ¬ˆ 1883-1893. ˆšÃªÂ¬Ã¬ˆšÃ«Â¬Ã„ˆšÃªÂ¬ˆžˆšÃ«Â¬ÃˆšÃªÂ¬ˆž II, ˆšÃªÂ¬üˆšÃ«Â¬Ã„ˆšÃªÂ¬ˆˆšÃ«Â¬Ã„ˆšÃªÂ¬ÂµˆšÃªÂ¬Â¥ˆšÃªÂ¬ˆˆšÃªÂ¬Ã¦ ˆšÃªÂ¬Ã². ˆšÃª?ˆšÃªÂ¬ˆˆšÃªÂ¬ˆ«ˆšÃªÂ¬Ã¦ˆšÃªÂ¬ÂªˆšÃªÂ¬ˆˆšÃ«Â¬Ãµ, ˆšÃªÂ¬üˆšÃªÂ¬ˆˆšÃ«Â¬Ã„ˆšÃªÂ¬Ã¦ˆšÃ«Â¬Ã‡ 1982, 10-11; ˆšÃªÂ¬üˆšÃªÂ¬ˆˆšÃ«Â¬Ã„ˆšÃªÂ¬Ã¦ˆšÃ«Â¬Ã‡ ˆšÃªÂ¬ˆ ˆšÃ«?ˆšÃ«Â¬Ã„ˆšÃªÂ¬ÂµˆšÃªÂ¬ˆ‘ ˆšÃª?ˆšÃªÂ¬ˆˆšÃ«Â¬Ã ˆšÃªÂ¬ˆžˆšÃªÂ¬‰¤ˆšÃ«?ˆšÃªÂ¬ˆ«ˆšÃªÂ¬ˆ 1894-1918. ˆšÃªÂ¬Ã¬ˆšÃ«Â¬Ã„ˆšÃªÂ¬ˆžˆšÃ«Â¬ÃˆšÃªÂ¬ˆž III, ˆšÃªÂ¬üˆšÃ«Â¬Ã„ˆšÃªÂ¬ˆˆšÃ«Â¬Ã„ˆšÃªÂ¬ÂµˆšÃªÂ¬Â¥ˆšÃªÂ¬ˆˆšÃªÂ¬Ã¦ ˆšÃªÂ¬Ã². ˆšÃª?ˆšÃªÂ¬ˆˆšÃªÂ¬ˆ«ˆšÃªÂ¬Ã¦ˆšÃªÂ¬ÂªˆšÃªÂ¬ˆˆšÃ«Â¬Ãµ, ˆšÃªÂ¬üˆšÃªÂ¬ˆˆšÃ«Â¬Ã„ˆšÃªÂ¬Ã¦ˆšÃ«Â¬Ã‡ 1982, p. 554.
Balkanalysis on Amazon Kindle